Editorial Board
  Editorial Policy
 
The Aims
The Review Process
  Contacts
  Electronic Access
  Published Papers
  Future Papers
  Instructions for Authors
Preparation of Manuscripts
Submission of Manuscripts
Revisions of Old Submissions
Subject Classifications
Resources for Authors
Copyright, Page Charges and Author Offprints
  Procedures for Handling Manuscripts
Referees
Guidelines for Referees
Guidelines for Associate Editors
Ethical Principles
  Subscriptions
  Back Issues
  Article Reprints
 
 
   
   
 

Editor, Associate Editor and Referee Ethical Principles

  1. Both the content of a submitted paper as well as the fact that a paper is under review is confidential and should not be disclosed to individuals who are not part of the review process.
  2. Editors, Associate Editors and Referees should refrain from handling papers authored by a departmental colleague or a current close collaborator.
  3. The Editors should refrain from reviewing for other statistical journals, first to ensure that the Editors are able to have sufficient time and energy to edit the Annals properly and second, to allow Annals decisions on papers to be made independently of whether the paper was previously submitted elsewhere.
  4. Authors should not be disadvantaged if they submit their papers elsewhere following a rejection by the Annals. Thus if an AE or referee has handled a paper rejected by the Annals, the AE or referee should refrain from subsequently disclosing the prior rejection and/or acting as a referee of this paper for another journal. (If invited to handle or referee the paper for another journal, they should decline without disclosing that they have seen the paper before.)
  5. Similarly, if an Annals AE or referee has previously handled a paper for another journal, they should decline to handle it for the Annals if possible without disclosing that they have handled it previously.
 
   
 
 

web site contact: imswebmaster@imstat.org